Reimagining L&D Platforms

Effective Skill Building in Large Organisations

Detailed UX Solution

Comprehensive UX

Duration

8 Weeks

Industry

Enterprise learning, upskilling, and talent development within large organizations

My Role

As the Lead UX Designer, I was responsible for the end-to-end design process, from initial research to final prototype

Led user research sessions with 24 employees across multiple teams

Facilitated design workshops with stakeholders and subject matter experts

Created wireframes, prototypes, and high-fidelity designs

Conducted usability testing and iterated based on feedback

Brief

Explore current learning experiences in large organisations to identify gaps and opportunities

Large organizations invest significantly in learning and upskilling initiatives to build workforce capability and remain competitive. However, professionals often struggle to engage with learning programs, apply new skills to their work, and see tangible outcomes from their efforts.
This project aims to explore how professionals across different roles experience learning and skill building today, identify key experience gaps, and uncover opportunities to reimagine enterprise learning in a way that is relevant, actionable, and impactful.

Problem

Learning exists, but skill application and impact are limited

Despite the availability of learning platforms and training programs in large organisations, learning and skill-building efforts often fail to translate into meaningful skill application, sustained engagement, or measurable impact.

Research
Objective

How do professionals currently discover, engage with, and apply learning at work?

What barriers prevent consistent engagement with learning initiatives?

How does upskilling (or lack of it) impact performance, motivation, and growth?

What role do managers and organizational structures play in enabling or constraining learning?

Where are the biggest gaps between organizational intent and employee experience?

To identify barriers and friction points that limit engagement, consistency, and application of learning

Project
Goal

Connect to Career Growth

Link learning activities directly to career paths and promotional opportunities within the organization.

Increase Engagement

Boost learning platform usage and course completion rates through personalized, relevant content.

Empower Leadership

Provide managers and L&D teams with insights to make data-driven decisions about workforce development.

User

Segment

These user segments were based on role, influence, impact, and accountability, not demographics.

To understand upskilling holistically, participants were segmented based on their role in the upskilling ecosystem. This allowed to capture perspectives from those who experience learning directly, those who enable or constrain it, and those responsible for policy and outcomes.

Segment

User(s) Title

New Joiners

Business Architecture Senior Analyst;

Management Consulting Analyst

Employees <1 year tenure; Early learning dependents; have unclear learning path; need guidance

Individual Contributors

Packaged App Development Analyst;

User Exp Engineering Analyst

People with 6 years of experience; Primary learners; Mentor others;

share insights on What skills matter vs what training provides

People Managers

Management Consulting Manager;

Business Architecture Associate Manager;

IT Risk Advisory Senior Manager

Learning enablers & policy proxies; Skill gaps in teams;

Share insights about constraints; performance; skills required;

learning vs application

Internal Transfers/ Promotions

Interaction Design Analyst;

Packaged App Development Specialist

Actively engaged in upskilling; Touched multiple learning programs;

Gaps during transition; Learning relevance of multiple course(s)

Description, Intent and Goal

Below are list of user segments, selected to capture perspectives across execution, enablement, and stage wise learning experiences.

Research

Method

Synchronous Semi-Structured Interviews (Audio-only)

Qualitative, generative UX research using semi-structured interviews conducted via a mix of synchronous audio calls and asynchronous written responses. A core set of questions was asked across all participants to ensure consistency, with follow-up probes tailored by role.


Note: Participants were informed of the research purpose, assured confidentiality, and consented to their responses being used for research synthesis.

Questions for User’s & Data Collected

Research
Debrief

The research focused on understanding behaviors, motivations, constraints, and role-specific influences on learning.

The goal was to identify gaps between organisational intent and on-ground reality, and to uncover systemic barriers that prevent continuous skill development across roles. To capture diverse perspectives, the study included managers, team leads, individual contributors, and one participant who recently transitioned roles.

Key Findings

Pain Points

Irrelevant Content

68% of users found courses not aligned with their job needs

No Career Connection

82% couldn't see how learning impacted career progression

Time Constraints

75% struggled to find time for learning during work hours

Unrelated Topics do not contribute to real-time execution

60% felt learning is not related to execution in project

Opportunities

Personalization

Users want AI-driven recommendations based on their role

Social Learning

89% valued peer learning and knowledge sharing

Microlearning

Short, focused content preferred over lengthy courses

Progress Tracking

Desire to visualize skill growth and achievements

Persona’s

Below are 3 key persona’s - fictional, semi-realistic representation of a target audience based on research & data with demographics, behaviours, pain points & needs

“I can only scale my responsibilities if I’m confident my team is truly ready —not just trained.”


Ankit is a people manager with 10 + years of experience, who is responsible for balancing delivery commitments with long-term team growth. He is accountable for outcomes but often lacks clear visibility into whether learning efforts have translated into real capability.


Pain Points:

Lack of clear indicators of employee readiness

Forced to assume capability under time pressure

Learning outcomes are not visible or measurable

Over-focus on hard skills at the cost of leadership and soft skills


Goals:

Ensure delivery commitments are met without constant escalations

Build a reliable, capable team that can scale

Make confident decisions around readiness, promotions, and role fit

Personality Traits:

Outcome-driven

Risk-aware

Pragmatic

Time-constrained

Ankit Sharma

Role:

People Manager

Title:

Management Consulting Manager

Age:

36

“There’s a lot of information, but I don’t know who to go to or what actually matters right now.”


Neha has recently joined the organization and is navigating onboarding, learning systems, and informal support structures. While learning content is available, a lack of clarity around ownership, expectations, and feedback makes it difficult for her to build confidence early on.


Pain Points:

Receives inconsistent or delayed feedback regarding the role in project(reactive) post a delivery

Learns through trial and error and reaches out to peers due to unclear guidance

Learning portals offer generic content not mapped to their actual role or project

Lack of curated, role-specific course recommendations


Goals:

Use multiple learning sources to close immediate skill gaps(Must have vs nice to have skills)

Identify role-aligned learning paths instead of generic onboarding courses

Understand the project context, business background, and expectations they are assigned to

Personality Traits:

Eager to learn

Overwhelmed

Cautious

Unsure

Neha Rao

Role:

New Joiner

Title:

Engineering Analyst

Age:

24

“I’m expected to deliver quickly, but the learning doesn’t fully prepare me for the role.”


Ashok is an experienced individual contributor who has transitioned into a new role internally. He is expected to demonstrate readiness quickly but finds that internal learning content is vague, fragmented, and misaligned with industry and role-specific expectations.


Pain Points:

Internal learning content feels vague or misaligned with role demands

Needs to navigate multiple learning sources without clear guidance

Lacks access to industry-aligned or credible certifications internally

No clear benchmarks to assess readiness


Goals:

Quickly identify and consume learning relevant to the new role

Use multiple learning sources to close immediate skill gaps

Meet performance expectations within defined transition timelines

Establish credibility in the new role to prove readiness

Personality Traits:

Credibility Conscious

Driven

Growth Oriented

Skill Builder

Ashok Goyal

Role:

Individual Contributor

Title:

Business Arch Senior Analyst

Age:

28

Empathy

Map

To deepen understanding beyond surface-level behaviours, empathy maps were created for each key persona identified during research. These maps synthesise patterns observed across interviews, capturing what employees think, feel, say, and do as they navigate learning and skill-building within the organisation.

By visualising emotional drivers, constraints, and unmet needs, the empathy maps help reveal why existing learning experiences feel disconnected from real work and growth

External - Says and does (observable)

Internal - Thinks and feels (inferred , invisible)

Empathy Maps

The

Manager

Says

Does

Thinks

Feels

Frustrated by recurring escalations

Mentally overloaded about deciding readiness

“I need to make people decisions with incomplete data.”

Assigns tasks based on perceived readiness

Pushes short-term hard-skill learning for the team

Relies on assumptions,experience and instinct over data

Defers soft-skill development

“My team’s capability defines my delivery success.”

“Who is genuinely ready vs just busy learning?”

“I don’t have visibility into learning outcomes.”

“I cannot trust team with stakeholder management.”

Accountable for both delivery and growth

“Focus on delivery first.”

“Let’s upskill them on what’s immediately required.”

“Tell me when you’re ready.”

“We’ll revisit growth once things stabilize.”

“Let me know if you need support.”

Pressured by timelines and client expectations

Problem

Statement

Main Problem statement and supportive statements throwing light on what is broken and why it matters

Problem statements translate observed behaviors, emotional tensions, and systemic gaps into actionable design challenges. Instead of jumping to solutions, this step ensures we anchor on the real user struggle, the root cause behind it, and the impact on both the user and the business.

Employees across roles are learners at different career stages

who need role-relevant learning to become delivery-ready but face generic, compliance-driven learning

because learning is designed around completion metrics rather than role readiness or safe learning experimentation.

This results in low confidence, delayed productivity, and unclear ROI on learning investments.

The "Safety- Net" Gap (User Perspective)

Individual Contributors and Transtioners are professionals navigating role growth who need need a way to identify and fix skill gaps, but they are hesitant to have open conversations about their weaknesses for fear of appearing incompetent

because learning systems lack structure, depth and safe learning experimentation.

This results in users "winging it" during high-stakes delivery, leading to preventable mistakes and increased imposter syndrome.

The "Stale Growth" Gap (Organisation/Market/Policy Perspective)

Employees need industry-relevant skill growth to remain competitive but face a disconnect between internal training and evolving industry standards because internal L&D programs are not aligned with externally recognised skills or certifications.

This results in employees perceiving their growth as stagnant, seeking learning outside the organisation on external platforms like Udemy/ Coursera.

The Visibility Gap (Manager Perspective)

Managers are people leaders and in-charge of delivery

who need a clear way to assess team capability before delegating tasks, but they currently lack visibility into real-time skill levels because the system only tracks course completion.

This results in managers micromanaging hard skills and sacrificing their own stakeholder management time to fix "remedial" errors.

Overarching

HMW

Overarching HMW questions unify multiple HMWs into one direction

It encompasses multiple personas connecting multiple pain points and acts as a north star for the entire initiative guiding long term decisions

How might we enable role-ready, industry-aligned learning
for employees across career stages
in order to drive measurable capability, professional growth, and business impact?

Key Decisions - Value proposition

Role-Relevant Learning

Moves beyond generic modules to provide "Tribal Knowledge" and project-specific intelligence.

Replaces hours of aimless searching

Applied Learning with Safe-Failure Sandbox

A private simulation zone where transtioners can practice high-stakes executions with AI feedback before performing live.

Identifies blind spots in private

Project Portal

Relevant project files and context specific understandings and trainings to grow within Project

Reduces hours of mundane searching for relevant skills and project understanding

Micro-Learning Focus

Broke down lengthy courses into 5-15 minute modules that fit into busy schedules. Users can learn during coffee breaks.

On the go for busy schedule individuals

L&D Proposed Ecosystem

LearnHub Core

Central learning platform

Learning Paths

Skill Tracking

Safe Sandbox

MS Teams

Team readiness & collaboration

Skill Dashboard

Team Analytics

Learning Reminders

Jira

Skill-based task assignment

Auto Assignment

Skill Matching

Gap Alerts

Integration Flow

LearnHub

Teams Bot

Jira API

Certifications

Wireframes

A basic sketch was done to navigate through the initial design process. Helped in understanding the main functionalities & screens that play a big role while prototyping.

Detailed wireframes showcasing key features: safe sandbox environment, dual dashboards, quick learnings, and project-based training.

1. Employee Dashboard

Personalized learning hub with recommended courses, progress tracking, and quick access to sandbox practice areas.

Dashboard

My Learning

Sandbox

Projects

Quick Learns

Career Path

42%

12

5h

8

2. Manager Dashboard

Comprehensive view of team learning progress, skill gaps, and training recommendations with actionable insights.

Team View

Overview

Team Analytics

Skill Matrix

Assign Training

Reports

Team Size

24

Avg Progress

68%

Skills Gap

12

This Week

142h

3. Safe Sandbox Environment

Isolated practice environment where employees can experiment, learn by doing, and make mistakes safely without affecting production systems.

SANDBOX MODE

1

2

3

API

Database

Frontend

Auth

main.js

app.js

+

Run

Reset

Save

Preview

Console

4. Quick Learning Module

Micro-learning interface for 5-15 minute learning sessions that fit into busy schedules, with progress tracking and immediate application.

5 min

3 of 5

Point 1

Point 2

Point 3

← Previous

Next →

Save Note

Open Sandbox

5. Project Files & Training Portal

Centralized hub for project-specific resources, documentation, and contextual training materials organized by active projects.

Search...

/

/

Files

Training

Resources

Team

PDF

XLSX

VIDEO

12m

PPTX

TRAINING

8m

DOCX

View All

Wireframe

Feedback

The goal of this feedback was to assess clarity, relevance, confidence, and decision-making support within the experience.

These 1:1 conversations allowed for deeper probing, follow-up questions, and contextual understanding—especially around how users currently make learning decisions and how the proposed experience would fit into their real workflows.

Key Insights

Breaking L&D Portals 4th wall and integrating it with existing applications(Teams and Jira)Keeping in mind that Teams serves as the always-available entry point for quick learning queries, while the portal supports deeper learning needs. At the same time, Jira surfaces employee readiness signals, allowing managers to assign work based on skill readiness.

Managers need a clear separation between viewing their team’s capability and assessing their own growth readiness. The dashboard experience is therefore intentionally segmented—allowing managers to evaluate team capacity independently from reflecting on their personal development and alignment for future responsibilities.

Integrating externally recognized certifications (industry platforms, vendors, professional bodies) using API’s into the internal L&D portal allows employees to translate personal learning effort into organizationally visible growth signals and reducing bias-driven or inconsistent growth outcomes.

An Expert Node / Mentor layer within the Project Knowledge Atlas gives new joiners a clear, human entry point into complex project contexts. Instead of navigating fragmented documents or guessing whom to approach, new joiners can identify verified experts tied to specific domains, decisions, or project phases. This reduces hesitation, accelerates onboarding, and builds confidence by allowing them to ask context-aware questions and validate their understanding early.

While retaining mandatory compliance requirements, the portal is designed to actively support and enable employee growth and transition new joiners seamlessly into their projects and roles.

Next Steps & Future Enhancements

Planned Features

AI-powered learning assistant for personalized coaching

Integration with performance review systems

Enhanced social features including live learning sessions

Mobile app for on-the-go learning

Expansion Plans

Rolling out to 10 additional organizations in Q2

Developing industry-specific content libraries

Building partnerships with leading course providers

Exploring international markets and localization

View Other Case Studies

swetha

HOME

MORE WORK

OTHER EXPERIMENTS